The latest act of the UPA-2 govt, which might have potentially far reaching consequences is allowing the FDI in multi brand retail. I have been hearing the argument that almost is "More FDI means reforming the economy for good". One can not say FDI is always good or always bad. It is not a white or black question. Whether it benefits the nation or not depends on the context. Sadly the kind or discourse set in this nation is that people who are for FDI are progressive and those against it are regressive.
FDI when introduced in multi brand retail can have far reaching consequences. Such a move requires threadbare discussion and debate, which unfortunately is missing. UPA-2 govt, had repeatedly said that an important institution of the parliament can not be bypassed or forced into making an important legislation like Lokpal without proper discussion and debate. The same Govt when it comes to FDI in retail, thinks otherwise.
I somehow see a similar pattern between the nuclear deal in 2008 to the current situation. Back then, anyone who opposed the nuclear deal was portrayed as a person who is unpatriotic, regressive etc. The media played a big role in shooting down the dissent and differing view point. I doubt if the media would be any different this time around.
A couple of articles in the foreign media appear criticizing the prime minister about the tragic state of affairs and surprisingly it spurns the PM and the Govt into action(which hardly cared about the resentment in this nation). Is there more arm twisting behind the scene than what is visible?
The message going out from this GOVT is "We value and remember democratic values and institutions ONLY when it will help our political objectives"